Report on Female Staff Discrimination at Columbia University, February 1971, page 2

Download: Transcript

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 View All

Show transcript

           
   

.x-¥'¢_  , ’ 
'-4~,~‘: . ’ 

     
  
 
 
  
  

% .;,.k,_

..s_'‘‘ 57:‘ H: ,<
if%£fi¥:?
.;

  

%,v;“

 

it.‘

iII,%"

"% iv} f

}%rAfF1rWa*iv¢ A¢f%'

5' s§fi1h1¢s:;

 ’T#2Af§5 Lette t

i£.'nJ....-‘-.:.'n-«-- -w-M-.‘.‘o:'u'.:/.. .‘.- . \ -. .  L.“ ..

TA BLE OF CONTENTS

    
  
 
  

.

General Statement.................}..........;.....Q....; 1

Evidence of Sexual Discrimination.;-......;..;........;.; 3
Employment Ratios é ‘
Case Histories _ V.
other University Policies

  
  
 

Coné1u§iDns,§;.;g;.Lf§¢
suggesgedéhreasxfpv

‘ Q‘§»Ioo iooooiIofoooc--o~uonuu'oaooo1-6
an Inquiry --
sgfiqr the University

    
   
      
  
   
      
  
  
  

'uéarings on Status of

domuvubooocroooyonouon-nodaooola

Report gn March, IQJO
>‘v‘0flyen._-q 9 I 9 0‘ o‘o‘_u o"o_ I

.,.

#LV 4;-Committ§ on
“ '”VFaéu1ty } 

0‘ iminét ion Agu ins t ywonfén

 

"h cf Personnpl _
.0 7r‘<'?'./E‘ 1,qr“; of P er.'~:onne1

.imination Questionnaire
(;()1‘l!mb ta M

 

 

       fl  

-- may