Report on Female Staff Discrimination at Columbia University, February 1971, page 28

           

u  . 1 '

 Pi':£A2’s i‘i!¢;§§1t¢l*tcG111.”: ‘   ' ‘’

ajdcnt I _
 fiemorinl Library 
uI'Ib_ia”UI1£ver.s1ty  

 p f f the repoflx-t: r.:¢)::s1:)11a€lTby‘

 t_h_e~8eng.te1SVub-NC mittcw on the Status of Wmwmtat? 
ifoluvdain and ‘the: S_3:af,f\ D13 . . 11 Comm

ittue of‘ Colunliié 

J
u

" '_ gjepnrt *wa'u_g1yen to the 1nvest1gnt:or-n‘frorI‘|_t!h!
t  n_t af Labozf (Ms,*Symons) 'and~ HEW last week, 1-9:; would;
O’i“AatH ybut‘ rf¢_a_C1_1fI,8 _j1_t.thrang’h.‘andAgAiving us yuutj‘ c
‘tyom-' eat-litgst cpnv n1‘ ‘   _ _  é 4 _
aj final copy hinca an - much: data
-we would likq yaw "cormtufg ’~

col   _I;Wom'en'7.s Libet-atlon H
~ as Ean1"m‘1_1 » . V  ; _ :

recéiving "a .r,ougl’1" afhf it