Report on Female Staff Discrimination at Columbia University, February 1971, page 9

          .-———«r—« v ~ —v —~ ——-—.—.—_»..__._._._.- _,.

1*

‘Pk

**U

Lt. *fi

i*

_Huau
'Nur=vw
_0rganist

POSITIO.Ԥ2_

Coordinator

ASS't. Conrninnth“
Counsellors

Curator

0r§i2n0r-

Dietivian

Editor

Auqouiate Editor
Engineer

Finanvinl Aid Officer
Gift Recorder 0
Health Physive Oifivur

' Histologist

Illustrator.
Inrvrn
Librarian

. A§s‘t. Librarian

Mathematiciun _
Mediral Dffivur
Mortician
Nurse

Patholagist
Personnel Officrr
Photographer
Physician
Physicist
Placement Officer
Plannér

Proctor‘
Progra'mm'e r

Junior Programmer

0Projects Offibor

Psychiatrist
Psychologist

Recorder

Veternariau

Research Engineer

Sr. Rnsearvh Svientiat
Research Scientist
Research worker

Social worker

Sr. Staff Associate
Staff Associate

Staff Decorator
Student Record Officer
Statistician

Surguon ‘

Systnma Analyst

Tech. 1n?ormation Offiovr
Therapist "
Trainer

.. ..-...'.».. ..aun- ,5...‘ .......s-=.

aw (in z ‘ 4
HER ‘V
 1 '
E’ (I
1 H
I‘) I
I <
31 I
0 I
U 1
02 0
0 I
0 E
U? Q
23 ~ HR
0 A ‘ 1
1 u
27 0
72‘ 0
l I
3 .102
1 U
1. 0, n
1 , 1
8 2
189 26
1 1
1 U
1 0
1 h
in" 2
3
q r
£4 ‘
0 j
3 H
1 V0
1 U
25 3
27 70
3 ‘.47
13 L
39 .0
0 ¥
J ’ 1
H 3‘
2 1 (L
H 0
2 1
3 13
2 U
....-.-....._ .... . .,..~...... .. -.5-.- ...,.... . . ..

\:J‘ _,_ .-
r-4.»-4:‘.;;—-Ir\.\--—t~-.:_'.;:'J

97
30
10
33

21
0

15

 ’

‘Wu?

"‘IU.UV

70.0
a2_R
lUU.U
30.0
35.7
3.5 ,U
qg_q
0.0

0.Uv

100.0
0.0
0.0

85.8
32.0
0.0

100.0

1nn_0

500.0

90.0
'2.9
luu.()

100.0

50.0
00.0
87.9

‘$0.0

100.0

100.0

.1U0.0

73.7
60.0
{)‘5. 3
77.8
U4hS
0.0
100.0
l00.U
100.0
89.3
27.8
.g10.0
92.9
12.1
0.0

(1 . ()

57.2
100.0
100.0

hf), 7

15.3
100.0

w

g_§_.¥iA_I.£

 

63.
50.
2%.

0,

H .
CU‘Nw..CN Ln;--t\;u1
.\l\lO'NC«OC."OCU1NUVO£7\’:DC3C:ol'uQo

P""V
SCSW LD\.'>——
NOD

o

a

o

v

o

5C3‘!-"GL5: ‘JR-‘«C2CDUJ

O‘“‘NC3C>®P*Olvjdtzclciclrru~Ao;y:3c:c:c:p-c;g

_....
...a