The Scholar and the Feminist IV press release, 1977, page 1

Download: Transcript

Pages:2 View All

Show transcript


The academic conference of the Barnard College Women's Center will be held
this year on Saturday, April 23, 1977. It is the fourth in a series examining
the impact of feminism on traditional modes of scholarship. This year's
conference, The Scholar and The Feminist IV: Connecting Theory, Practice and
Values, focuses on a set of questions now attracting the attention of feminist
scholars in many disciplines: Why do the results of traditional scholarship
so consistently support/justify the social status quo? To what extent do
scholars consciously or unconciously share the assumptions and values of the
larger community and how do these assumptions determine the concepts, data,
and theories with which they work? In particular, what are the social proces-
ses-vthe day-to—day practices -by which scholarly knowledge is defined, crea-

ted, and disseminated? How do these practices exclude a feminist perspective?

In the morning session, two papers will be presented. Diana Long Hall, an
historian of science at the Radcliffe Institute, will give a case study of the
way knowledge in a new field, sex endocrinology, develops in the context of
implicit assumptions about science and about the nature and roles of women and
men. She will point to some of the ways in which social and political forces
affected the theoretical frameworks with which scientists Worked. Mary Payer,
a social philosopher at Columbia University, will provide an analysis of the
broader social and theoretical implications of the specific day-to-day scien-
tific and scholarly practices discussed by Hall. Through an analysis of such
concepts as "science," "knowledge," and "interest," Payer will clarify the
ways in which fundamental assumptions can bias the entire enterprise of schol-

arship. The implications of both papers for feminist scholarship will be dis-